Newsletter>
Synergie Studies

May 4, 2007

Study Results: The Effectiveness of Synergie AMS™ 
Treatments in Reducing the Appearance of Cellulite 
Robert L. Youngblood, M.D. 
James E. Pickens, M.D., F.A.C.S. 
 
Background and Purpose 
 
Vacuum massage devices are currently used to deliver 
massage treatments for aesthetic improvement in the 
superficial fat layer of the skin. This study of 48 female 
subjects was designed to measure and document the effects 
of vacuum massage treatments with the Synergie AMS™ device. 
The purpose of this study was not only to observe whether 
changes in the appearance of cellulite may be derived, but 
also to measure whether and to what degree areas treated 
may expect to experience a loss in girth as a result of 
treatments. The study was also intended to determine the 
effect of adding further factors of exercise and 
nutritional supplements to the Synergie AMS™ treatment 
regimen. 
 
Method 
 
To accommodate the purpose of the study, four different 
criteria were established and applied to four different 
groups of women. Groups were identified A, B, C, D. 
 
Group A received AMS treatments only.  
Group B received AMS treatments and took nutritional 
supplements.  
Group C received AMS treatments and added an exercise 
regimen.  
Group D received AMS treatments, took nutritional 
supplements, and added an exercise regimen.  
To document results, subjects were measured and 
photographed at the start of the study, at the midway 
point, and at the end of the study. Each subject was given 
a relative cellulite rating from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating 
no visible cellulite, and 5 indicating most severe 
cellulite. At the end of the study, subjects were asked to 
evaluate whether they had seen a reduction in the 
appearance of cellulite. 
 
Subjects 
 
A group of volunteer female applicants was screened for 
meeting essential criteria: age (20 to 50 years old), 
weight (up to 40 pounds over ideal weight), 
contraindications (did not have any of the conditions 
listed by the manufacturer as contraindicated). A total 
number of 48 participants was selected from the applicants 
who met this criteria. During the term of the study, 
participants were prohibited from taking any dietary 
substances for weight loss purposes except the nutritional 
supplements provided to Groups B and D in conjunction with 
this study. Over the eight-week term of the study, 12 
participants discontinued their participation due to 
pregnancy, illness, or inability or unwillingness to comply 
with criteria: Thirty-six participants completed the study 
including 11 from Group A, 8 from Group B, 7 from Group C, 
and 10 from Group D. 
 
Apparatus 
 
The Synergie AMS™ device manufactured by Dynatronics was 
used to deliver treatments to the study participants. The 
device offers 10 vacuum settings and a countdown timer. Two 
treatment head sizes were used. 
 
Procedure 
 
All participants in all four groups received a 30-minute 
AMS treatment twice a week for eight weeks, for a total of 
16 treatments. All participants were instructed not to 
change their current eating habits, to drink 6 to 8 
(8-ounce) glasses of water daily and up to 3 liters of 
water on the day of their treatments, and were prohibited 
from participating in a weight loss program during the 
study or from taking any weight loss supplements except 
those provided to their group (Groups B and D) as a part of 
this study. In addition to these instructions, participants 
in each group were given specific rules and instructions 
for their respective groups. 
 
Group A. No additional instructions or rules applied to 
Group A.  
Group B. This group was required to take three nutritional 
supplements three times daily. The supplements, under the 
Synergie NSP™ brand name, included Fat Metabolizer, 
CarbAid™, and MetaSlim™.  
Group C. This group was required to add a moderate aerobic 
exercise regimen for 30 minutes 3 to 5 times a week.  
Group D. This group was required to take the nutritional 
supplements described for Group B and was required to add 
the exercise regimen described for Group C.  
Participants were provided with a daily log sheet to record 
their individual performance. The log sheet was reviewed by 
the AMS treatment technician at each treatment appointment, 
and the participant's compliance with the program was 
logged in the participant's file. 
 
The AMS massage treatments were delivered primarily to the 
thigh, hip, abdomen, and buttocks areas, and to both right 
and left sides of the body. At the end of the fourth week 
and at the end of the study, each participant was again 
measured, and photographed. At the end of the study, each 
participant was asked to state a subjective opinion as to 
whether or not she had seen a reduction in the appearance 
of cellulite. 
 
Data Analysis 
 
Data was compiled in a table with separate tabulations for 
each of the four groups; A, B, C, and D. Measurements for 
inches lost in the waist, hips, and thighs were added 
together for a total of all inches lost for each 
individual. Inches lost were averaged by group. 
 
Results 
 
Of the 36 participants who completed the study, 100% 
experienced a loss in girth. Table I shows the average 
inches lost by group. Group A lost an average of 3.4 total 
inches in the areas measured. Group B lost an average of 
4.5 inches, Group C an average of 5.4 inches, and Group D 
an average of 6.1 inches. Of all 36 participants, 91% 
reported a visible reduction in the appearance of 
cellulite: 31 reported a visible reduction in the 
appearance of cellulite, 3 reported no visible reduction, 
and 2 did not report as they did not have visible cellulite 
at the start of the study. Of the 3 who reported no visible 
reduction, one was a participant in Group A, one in Group 
C, and one in Group D. 
 
Conclusions 
 
The reduction in the appearance of cellulite was 
essentially the same across all four groups of 
participants. Therefore, it is concluded that the AMS 
treatments themselves were the single most important factor 
resulting in reduction in the appearance of cellulite. 
 
Greater loss of inches was seen when factors of exercise 
and nutritional supplements were added. The greatest inch 
loss was seen in the group that added both factors of 
nutritional supplements and exercise to the AMS treatments. 
It is, therefore, concluded that a complete program 
including Synergie AMS treatments, exercise, and 
nutritional supplements will produce the greatest possible 
results in inches lost. 100405


Site created by the team at BacikInvitations.com utilizing EasyBuilder Technology.